Blog 3 : What is the relation between politics and globalization—CUI ZAN

Globalization has indeed transformed the political landscape we are familiar with. It is no longer dominated solely by nation-states but increasingly involves transnational organizations and NGOs. This dispersion of power may seem like progress, but it also complicates many issues. For instance, reaching an international agreement often requires balancing the interests of various countries and even making compromises. These compromises can weaken national independence, leading some to approach globalization with skepticism or even resistance.

From my perspective, globalization is not merely a change in political forms but a redefinition of power structures. It has made international regulations more intricate and decentralized the exercise of authority. The impact of globalization on politics goes beyond the national level, influencing the lives of ordinary people. While globalization brings us closer in terms of economics, culture, and politics, it sometimes creates a sense of alienation, especially when global issues and local needs clash. This is particularly evident in certain international matters such as environmental issues and immigration policies. Although globalization has advanced discussions on these topics, individual countries often make decisions based on their own interests, further complicating governance.

However, we cannot overlook the contradictions brought about by globalization. As nations strive for the benefits of globalization, they often face domestic discontent and concerns over the loss of sovereignty. This tension is particularly pronounced in major issues such as immigration policies and global carbon emission agreements. While globalization appears to promote global cooperation, such cooperation often comes at the cost of sacrificing aspects of national autonomy. In dealing with globalization, many countries are forced to strike a delicate balance between international collaboration and the demands of their domestic electorate. This tension often fuels the rise of nationalist sentiments, becoming a significant impediment to the progress of globalization.

In conclusion, I believe the relationship between globalization and politics is not simply a matter of opposition or integration but rather an ongoing process of adjustment and interaction. Globalization injects new vitality into politics but also exposes governance shortcomings. It compels us to reconsider the core purpose of politics—whether it should prioritize national interests or pursue global objectives. These questions have no definitive answers, but their existence has deepened my understanding of the complex and subtle relationship between globalization and politics. Moreover, this profound transformation calls for new points of balance to be found through observation and practice, leaving us both hopeful and cautious about the future.